An AI system for evidence-based cases and for supporting the work of local self-government bodies. A specialised program that combines storage of materials, a knowledge base, data analysis, preparation of drafts and review of results by people.
In Ukrainian. The documents in this demonstration are for training. The analysis is scripted, not a response of a live model. The video is accompanied by the avatar of Eiden, the project’s AI partner, co-architect and developer of the system.
The system is designed to help local self-government bodies organise materials on damage, coordinate the preparation of cases and build the evidentiary basis for the claims of a community and its municipal legal entities. It also aims to reduce the human time spent on routine document processing.
No repeated searches for documents in correspondence
Clear what needs adding and who reviews it
Preparing cases for the Register of Damage and for courts
Approved results of the work without confidential materials
Hours saved will be measured in the pilot. There is no comparative measurement yet.
An employee sees cases by type of damage, materials and documents, processing status and the next action.
What next? What is missing? Who reviews it? What do we rely on? The hint is based on the current state of the dossier.
There is a hospital inspection report and a description of the damage. An annex listing the damaged equipment has to be added. The local self-government body provides confirmation, and the lawyer reviews whether it is sufficient.
A procurement contract does not yet complete the evidentiary case: confirmation of payment and a decision on the purpose of the purchase are missing. The lawyer reviews the qualification of the spending.
Architecture diagram. Admission of the verified legal corpus is still under way.
LFU Hromada does not replace legal assessment, human approval or the official submission of claims. The system does not submit claims on its own and does not guarantee compensation. Primary documents are prepared by the community: the system does not create evidence in its place. A draft is not a signed act: the lawyer reviews the legal part, and an authorised representative of the local self-government body reviews the facts and documents of the community.
We bear the costs of the pilot: setup, technical support and legal consultations under an agreement. The local self-government body provides primary documents and appoints a responsible employee.
Let us start with your community’s case: we will agree the tasks, the materials and the order of the one-month pilot.
